Skip to content

Capabilities

Everything Jev can do revolves around three question types. One request may carry many questions (the docs call this parallel questioning, including “speculative” ones), each answered independently.

Type Asks Answer contains Confidence
Choice Pick one from ≤255 defined options choice + probabilities per option
Score Rate against 2–10 ordered levels score (probability-weighted mean, may be fractional) + legend + probabilities
Noul Yes/no question noul (probability of “yes”, 0–1)

Fields common to all types:

  • instructions: the question itself, in natural language
  • criteria: your enumerated definition of options/levels/criteria — this is where the “type safety” comes from: you define the answer space

A request’s questions map can hold many questions sharing one state. The official cookbook example: 13 regulatory questions over the GDPR article in one call were 12.2× cheaper and 10.0× faster than one call per question, with unchanged answers (official figures, verified 2026-09-21 via the official llms.txt index).

The docs also support speculative fan-out: send the questions that might matter and let your code decide which answers to use — ideal for judgment trees with many branches.

The docs are explicit: confidence is not a probability and not accuracy — it is a statistic of the answer distribution’s shape. The higher the concentration, the higher the confidence. The intended split:

  • The answer tells you what (choice/score/noul)
  • The confidence tells you whether to act — route low-confidence cases to humans or a fallback

There is an official pattern for exactly this, Confidence-gated routing (via the llms.txt index); all four of our use cases build on it.

Every response includes usage: { input_tokens, output_tokens }. Billing (official models page, verified 2026-09-22):

  • Input $0.042 per million tokens; output is free
  • ≤ 64k tokens per request; state + the longest single question ≤ 32k tokens
  • Rate limits: 250k tokens/s + 1200 requests/min (429-triggered; officially noted as subject to change)

See Limitations: text generation, open-domain QA, and long reasoning chains are all out of scope — including a quick checklist for judging fit.